1940-1945 — Part III: Finally to war, ‘playing soldier’ and wooing wife-to-be No 4

EACH of these essays/entries is intended to stand alone, so there is a certain degree of duplication in them as it is unlikely they will be read in sequence or even that all will be read by a visitor to these pages. This is intentional: someone reading an essay/entry must not be puzzled by some allusion she or he might not understand because they have not read the other essays/entries.




Under fire, Hemingway lost all fear of risking himself in war and all the tact and restraint that had characterised his behaviour in Spain. His deliberate exposure to danger was inspired by a number of complex factors: a fatalistic attitude, an ability to dismiss the possibility of death, a belief that he was lucky and therefore invulnerable, and a desire to make an impressive adolescent gesture – even at the risk of his life – which would prove his courage
Jeffery Meyers, Hemingway, A Biography.
Did he receive preferential treatment as a war correspondent? Yes, I’m sure he did. So did a great many others . . . This accrues to fame and wide circulation. But Hemingway’s special privileges by no means depended on his literary renown. He had covered wars before and was, moreover, very much a military buff. He was he was an expert on strategy, tactics and military history. He spoke the same language as senior officers and many of them sought his company and conceived a great respect and personal affection for him.
Jeffery Meyers, in Hemingway, a biography

quoting fellow war correspondent Charles Collingwood.
The Tempest is a great, gaunt airplane. It is the fastest pursuit job in the world and is as tough as a mule. It has been reported with a speed of 400mph and should dive way ahead of its own noise. Where we were living, its job was to intercept the pilotless planes and shoot them down over the sea or in the open country as they came in on their sputtering roar toward London. . . . You love a lot of things if you live around them, but there isn’t any woman and there isn’t any horse, nor any before nor any after, that is as lovely as a great airplane, and men who love them are faithful to them even though they leave them for others. A man has only one virginity to lose in fighters, and if it is a lovely plane he loses it to, there his heart will always be.
Ernest Hemingway, London Fights The
 Robots, Collier’s, August 19, 1944.

BETWEEN D Day on June 6 and finally arriving in France to Europe in mid-July, Hemingway spent time with Welsh (who was, though, not short of other admirers) and toured RAF stations in England, 
inspecting the RAF’s new Tempest aircraft and joining several bombing missions over France as an observer (which flights he described in later life as ‘serving with the RAF’).

Many of those he met had read his work, and he was largely celebrated as ‘the famous author Ernest Hemingway’, but he did not impress everyone. After he was introduced to several senior officers in the mess of one RAF station, he later wondered in print why they had not joined the more junior ranks on dangerous missions over Europe.

The implication that they were keeping out of harm’s way annoyed many — Hemingway did not know that these officers were privy to the D Day plans and the War Office had grounded them in case they crashed in France, were captured and interrogated.

Though Hemingway would not have been told why they were not flying, it was distinctly tactless of him to suggest they were cowards. Generally, there was a feeling that Hemingway, all high spirits and bonhomie, was trying too hard to be ‘Hemingway’.

In his biography, Carlos Baker quotes an RAF public relations officer John Pudney, who found Hemingway’s behaviour curiously offensive:
‘To me,’ said Pudney, ‘he was a fellow obsessed with playing the part of the Ernest Hemingway and hamming it to boot, a sentimental 19th-century actor called upon to act the part of the 20th-century tough guy. Set beside . . . a crowd of young men who walked so modestly and stylishly with Death he seemed a bizarre cardboard figure.’
. . .

After a brief one-week visit to France in mid-July when Hemingway was attached to one of General George’s Patton’s tank divisions, he returned to London complaining he did not understand tank warfare and was bored.

He was soon back in Normandy, attaching himself to the 22nd regiment of General Raymond Barton’s infantry division under Colonel Charles ‘Buck’ Lanham (right with Hemingway). For the next seven
months, between late July 1944 and the end of December, what fighting Hemingway saw and occasionally took part in was in the company of Lanham and his officers and men.

Hemingway idealised Lanham, though largely in his own interests, and partly based Colonel Richard Cantwell, the central protagonist of his later novel Across The River And Into The Trees, on him. Jeffrey Reynolds sums it up well:

It would not be an exaggeration to say that Lanham, Hemingway’s alter ego, was one of his greatest fictional creations. He was idealized to heroic proportions to match Hemingway’s urgent need for a wartime comrade who would reflect, confirm, exalt and perpetuate his own martial expertise and daring adventures.

Meyers quotes fellow correspondent Bill Walton (also attached to the 22nd regiment) describing Lanham as ‘small, delicate and very neurotic’ and, adds Meyers,

With his lean, gray look, [Lanham] bore a striking resemblance to Dashiell Hammett.

Though a gallant soldier, he was also old-fashioned, straitlaced, thoroughly conventional, personally unimpressive and surprisingly dull. Gregory Hemingway [Hemingway’s third son who met him later when Lanham visited Havana] characterized him — in a far-fetched but perfectly appropriate word — as ‘nebbish’.

According to Meyers Lanham also seems to have idolised Hemingway. He writes that Lanham
like Mary [Welsh] accepted [Hemingway’s] faults and adored him. Lanham, with some exaggeration (Hemingway never carried a canteen of vermouth and did not drink heavily in war) told the New York Times correspondent C L Sulzberger: ‘Hemingway has the heart of the lion and is first class in war, but horrible in peace. Hemingway used to wander around with two canteens strapped to his belt. One was filled with gin and the other with vermouth. Whenever there was a quiet moment, he would haul out a battered tin cup and suggest: ‘Let’s have a martini’ he was a good fighter with all weapons, although strictly speaking he was not permitted to bear arms . . . He is entirely fearless.
Despite Hemingway’s claims later in life, his experience of ‘the war’, as a correspondent as well as at the front, was patchy.

Just as a Cuban submarine commander had suggested Hemingway was merely ‘a playboy’ when he was supposedly hunting German U-boots a year earlier (and fooling no one but himself), much the same might be claimed of his ‘soldiering’ in France after D Day, although he was certainly sometimes in danger and on one or two occasions could well have died.

There are several accounts of Hemingway’s sang froid, but his biographers cannot decide whether he was brave or simply reckless. Meyers writes
Under fire, Hemingway lost all fear of risking himself in war and all the tact and restraint that had characterised his behaviour in Spain. His deliberate exposure to danger was inspired by a number of complex factors: a fatalistic attitude, an ability to dismiss the possibility of death, a belief that he was lucky and therefore invulnerable, and a desire to make an impressive adolescent gesture – even at the risk of his life – which would prove his courage.
Perhaps the pertinent word here is ‘adolescent’: Hemingway’s conduct and behaviour which might be regarded as essentially adolescent was his bragging about sex (hinting at all the ‘broads’ he had bedded and later embarrassing Lanham and other friends about how many times he and Mary Welsh were having intercourse); his almost neurotic competitiveness, and his constant need to be the best at, and an expert on, everything; assuming his habitual no-nonsense, anti-intellectual tough-guy stance and playing down any notion that he might have sensitivity almost screams of teenage insecurity and does not speak of great maturity.

As for his apparent fearlessness, it is argued that he was, perhaps, simply no longer thinking straight. Barely two months after sustaining concussion in London in his early morning, blackout car crash, at the beginning of August in France he was again concussed.

He banged his head after leaping to safety from a motorcycle when he and photographer Robert Capa rounded a bend in the road and came face to face with a German anti-tank gun.

For several weeks he suffered from constant ringing in his ears, his speech was slow and slurred, he had a continual headache and complained he could not think clearly. That mishap also exacerbated the impotence (as his letters to Welsh indicate) which had started after the London crash and that lasted until well into November.

At one point Hemingway gave up all pretence of being a war correspondent when he ‘took command’ of a ragtag of French resistance fighters he had come across and who had adopted him as their leader and addressed him as ‘captain’ and ‘colonel’.

He and ‘his men’ made their headquarters in a hotel in Rambouillet, a town 30 miles south-west of Paris, and he sent out them out on patrol to garner intelligence on German positions.

In this instance Hemingway could well be accused of ‘playing soldier’ — he had removed his ‘war correspondent’ insignia from his uniform, acquired a large arsenal of rifles, pistols, ammunition and grenades in his hotel rooms, and interrogated German soldiers who had surrendered or been captured.

When his fellow correspondents arrived with the US army four days later — some of whom were not keen on Hemingway and his grandiosity — they felt his activities were putting their lives in danger: the Germans were entitled to execute as a spy a correspondent in uniform without credentials and might decide that Hemingway antics made all correspondents fair game.

They complained and at the beginning of October Hemingway was eventually summoned finally to testify before a military investigation.

. . .

It wasn’t just Hemingway’s fellow correspondents who were irritated by his grandiose airs. The French general Jacques-Phillipe Leclerc had been nominated by General Charles de Gaulle to lead the French forces into a liberated Paris, which he did on August 25, and he had arrived at the Chateau to Rambouillet, which was the summer residence of the French presidents, in preparation for the French forces’ triumphal entry.

Hemingway with Colonel David Bruce, who headed the newly formed OSS in France, arrived and announced he wanted to advise Leclerc on the best way to approach the city. In short order Leclerc told him to ‘fuck off’ and mind his own business.

But a chastened Hemingway got his slight revenge: in a piece for Collier’s which appeared on October 18 several weeks later he wrote that he had been
informed that the general [Leclerc] himself was just down the road and anxious to see us. Accompanied by one of the big shots of the resistance movement and Colonel B [David Bruce] . . . we advanced in some state toward the general. His greeting — unprintable — will live in my ears forever.
It is improbable that Leclerc, who — as Hemingway admits — dismissed him out-of-hand, was in any way ‘anxious’ to see him or solicit his advice, and it hurt Hemingway’s vanity to such an extent that for the rest of his life he referred to the general as ‘that jerk Leclerc’.

Later in his Collier’s piece Hemingway (adopting his persona as a man-of-the-world who regularly consorted with generals), wrote
In war, my experience has been that a rude general is a nervous general.
and hoped thereby to biff one back at Leclerc, but is was a tad feeble. Given Leclerc’s military experience (which dwarfed Hemingway’s), his courage and his determination, nervousness was one fault of which he could not be accused.

Two weeks before the Collier’s piece appeared, Hemingway had arrived in Nancy to give evidence at the investigation the US army had ordered into his conduct. For the first time in his life Hemingway played down his claims of derring-do (and with a view to containing the matter quickly, he had been instructed by General George Patton’s staff to perjure himself).

Yes, he admitted to the investigating officer, information about German activities had come his way, but this had been passed on to brigade headquarters as was his ‘duty as a loyal American’.

Yes, he had carried arms, but he had never done so in the town and it was for his own safety. (In fact, most correspondents carried a weapon for their own safety even though they were not allowed to do so.)

And, yes, if on occasion his insignia marking him out as a war correspondent was not visible, it was because it was attached to his jacket and this he had often removed because of the hot weather.

All in all, the army had felt obliged to follow up the correspondent’s complaints if only to keep them happy, but it was not inclined to be seen to punish ‘a loyal American’ simply ‘doing his duty’. Had he been


found to have contravened the rules governing accredited correspondents, Hemingway would have been stripped of his accreditation and sent back to the US (and it would have done his reputation not good at all).

In fact, Hemingway was let off the hook, and some accounts even suggest the investigation was regarded as something of a joke by the army. One practical consequence was that from then on until he was back in Cuba Hemingway made a point in letters and conversation of stressing that he was always ‘going by the book’. He wasn’t, of course.

. . .

Hemingway certainly sometimes shared the discomforts and tribulations of war with the officers and men (as did all frontline correspondents), especially during the disastrous — and as historians now argue — wholly unnecessary Hürtigenwald campaign between mid-September and mid-December 1944.

But in his book Hemingway Goes To War, Charles Whiting suggests that the longest Hemingway was at the front at one stretch before he took off back to Paris was eighteen days.

It must, though, be added that Whiting is guilty of at least one howler — that Hemingway’s maternal grandfather was a ‘Hadley’ and that ‘Hadley’ was Hemingway’s middle name. Such a gross error does counsel caution, but other biographers confirm that after the liberation of Paris in mid-August Hemingway seems to have spent more time living it up in Ritz Hotel than reporting on ‘the fighting’.

In fact after returning from Hürtigenwald in mid-December, he had joined Lanham’s 22nd regiment on the Belgian border with Germany, but spent almost all his time at Lanham’s HQ bed-ridden with pneumonia.

Then after he and, by an ironic chance, his estranged wife Martha (who had been invited by a mutual friend and did not know she and Hemingway had split up) spent Christmas and New Year with Charles Lanham, he returned to Paris and never returned ‘to the front’.

Between July 22 when Hemingway’s first dispatch, Voyage To Victory, was published by Collier’s and November 18 when his final report, War In [sic] The Siegfried Line, appeared, Hemingway had filed just six pieces. As these cost Collier’s $3,000 ($44,937 in 2022) each, the magazine was not happy, but that did not bother Hemingway.

By his own admission he had travelled to ‘the war in Europe’ for material to turn into fiction. Jeffery Meyers writes that the children’s author Roald Dahl (who had helped find Hemingway a berth on an RAF plane to Europe in mid-1944) was distinctly underwhelmed by Hemingway’s performance as a war correspondent after he had read several pieces.

In a letter to Meyers Dahl admitted
I would rate [Hemingway] as very poor, but he didn’t try to be good then. I remember him telling me about a wonderful episode concerning a man jumping out of a burning tank after his return from the invasion and when I said ‘But you have to put that in your Collier’s piece,’ he answered, ‘you don't think I’m going to give them that do you? I’m keeping it for a book.
Another story also illustrates the quality of Hemingway’s dispatches for Collier’s. In early August 1944 when several correspondents spent a long weekend at a hotel on Mount St Michel, Hemingway had shown his then most recent piece to fellow scribe Charles Collingwood and asked for his comments. In a letter to Jeffery Meyers, Collingwood reports that
Being a brash youngster, I blurted out ‘Well, Papa, it sounds like a parody of Ernest Hemingway.’ His face froze, and I forget whether he actually ushered my out or made it very clear I was to leave, which of course, I did — feeling like the most insensitive clown after so flattering a gesture on his part. He cut me dead for weeks . . . [But after the war, in Cuba] he asked me if I remembered the time in France when he had asked me for my opinion of a piece he had written for Collier’s and I [had] said it sounded like a parody of Ernest Hemingway. ‘You were right, of course,’ he said.
Collingwood confirmed that like many of the more famous figures who worked as correspondents, Hemingway did receive preferential treatment, but, he added
Hemingway’s special privileges by no means depended upon his literary renown. He had covered wars before and was very much a military buff. He was an expert on strategy, tactics and military history. He spoke the same language as senior officers and many of them sought his company and conceived a great respect and personal affection for him.
Tellingly, none of his biographers gives any detail at all of what Hemingway was up to between New Year 1945 and the end of March when he was back in Cuba.

We know that he was ensconced at the Ritz Hotel where he had been joined by Mary Welsh and where he proceeded to cajole her into marrying him. But what he actually did, apart from drink and party, is not recorded. He certainly did not file any more copy to Collier’s.

Just as whether or not Ernest Hemingway was one of the 20th century’s great modernist writers is a matter of choice, persuasion or prejudice, whether or not he was a brave combatant for several months in World War II or essentially a martial dilettante is equally debatable.

Knowing quite what to believe is almost impossible, and given his propensity in later life for making extraordinary claims about his exploits, it is advisable to treat them all with extreme caution.

He certainly did kill one or two German — that he gunned some down when the plywood cabin in Hürtigenwald that Col Lanham had made his headquarters came under attack has been documented. But his tales of taking the lives of over one hundred Germans, a figure which grew ever larger in each subsequent telling, are nonsense.

In a letter he sent after the war he even claimed:
One time I killed a very snotty SS kraut who, when I told him I would kill him unless he revealed what his escape route signs were said: You will not kill me, because you are afraid to and because you are a race of mongrel degenerates. Besides it is against the Geneva Convention. What a mistake you made, brother, I told him and shot him three times in the belly fast and then, when he went down on his knees, shot him on the topside so his brains came out of his mouth or I guess it was his nose. The next SS I interrogated talked wonderfully.
Hemingway was certainly a soldier manqué — some biographers claim that rather than having been rejected by the armed forces when the US declared war on Germany in 1917, he hadn’t even bothered trying to enlist as he suspected his weak left eye would disqualify him from service.

But he had, and did, read widely and deeply on military matters, and even though he had never led men in battle — certainly not, as he later claimed, leading a command of Arditi as its youngest ever lieutenant in the Battle of Monte Grappa — he was accepted by many professionals as having a good military brain.

Yet to his eternal chagrin, and despite his later very tall stories, he had never actually been under arms.

His few weeks leading in August freelancing with a gaggle of French resistance men and the times he was present at the Hürtigenwald offensive with Lanham and his 22nd regiment were the sum total of the World War II ‘fighting’ as far as he was concerned.

1940-1945 — Part II: At a loose end, lonely and depressed and his third marriage also ends

EACH of these essays/entries is intended to stand alone, so there is a certain degree of duplication in them as it is unlikely they will be read in sequence or even that all will be read by a visitor to these pages. This is intentional: someone reading an essay/entry must not be puzzled by some allusion she or he might not understand because they have not read the other essays/entries.




The loss of literary friends, remoteness from cultural life and lack of intellectual stimulation were increased by the move to Cuba, which put him out of touch with social and political reality in America. At the same time his estrangement from his family and separation from his children increased his sense of isolation. The dolce far niente life in the tropics made it more difficult for him to discipline himself. When Martha was away, he missed his immediate audience, became lonely and lacked the orderly household and attention to his needs that he had become accustomed to with Hadley and Pauline. When Martha was home, their domestic quarrels upset him. As his third marriage headed towards disaster, he found it more and more difficult to concentrate on his fiction.
Jeffrey Meyers, Hemingway: A biography.


WHILE Hemingway’s sub-hunting patrols began to last longer and he and his crew did not return to the Finca at night to live it up, Gellhorn relished the peace and quiet and tried to get on with writing a new novel (which was published in 1944 as Liana).

The time was also a respite from the rows she had with Hemingway that increasingly occurred, over her complaints that he was wasting his time, his boozing sessions and, biographer James R. Mellow reports, about their respective writing. This was a topic on which Hemingway was particularly sensitive.

While Gellhorn was progressing with her novel, he had written no fiction since For Whom The Bells Tolls was published and its success intimidated him. Their arguments could be vicious: Hemingway’s youngest son, Gregory, recalls his father shouting at Gellhorn
I’ll show you, you conceited bitch. They’ll be reading my stuff long after the worms have finished with you.
Yet Gellhorn also felt she should be doing more. Finally, in mid-1942, Collier’s hired her to undertake an extensive tour of various Caribbean islands and report on how they were being affected by the submarine war.

She was away for two months, and as always when she was not with Hemingway, her heart beat harder for him and (according to Bernice Kert) she wrote him ardent love letters almost daily. She was back at the Finca at the end of October, but the day after Christmas took off again, to visit her widowed mother in St Louis.

When Hemingway was home from his sub-hunting trips, her nagging that he should get himself over to Europe to report on the war carried on throughout 1943, but still he refused. Then, in mid-summer, Gellhorn accepted an offer from Collier’s to become its war correspondent in Europe, and she left in September.

With the Pilar in dry dock for maintenance and the navy dragging its heels over whether it still required its services, Hemingway was high-and-dry: he was no longer sub-hunting, could not go fishing, was afraid to start writing again but, worst of all, he was left in his own company and he hated being alone.

Writing to Hemingway, first from New York, where her departure had been delayed by several weeks, and then from London, Gellhorn still expressed her deep love for him and again repeatedly urged him to join her; but Hemingway was adamant that he would stay in Cuba, and no one is sure why. Jeffery Meyers suggests that he
had risked is life in Spain and still suffered from the emotional effects of his break with Pauline, was exhausted by the strain of completing For Whom The Bell Tolls and discouraged by the extreme discomforts of his trip to China. After his experience in Spain and China, he believed that the lies, propaganda and censorship necessary in war made it almost impossible to be an honourable correspondent.
However plausible such an explanation is, even Meyers seems to have his doubts: he also quotes Patrick Hemingway’s take on his father’s reluctance to travel to Europe to report on the war:
He felt that he was entitled to stay behind, living in a place that he liked and enjoying himself.
That his son Patrick gave this as Hemingway’s reasoning suggests it might even be something his father had explicitly told him or that Patrick inferred it from what his father said. There is now no way of knowing. In fact, Hemingway was certainly no longer enjoying himself.

Michael Reynolds in the final volume of his five-part biography offers this explanation:
Martha misunderstood Ernest’s lack of interest in going to another war as a journalist, but then she misunderstood the Pilar patrols also. Having spent six [sic] weeks as a Red Cross man in World War I and having covered the Greco-Turkish War (1922) as a reporter for the Toronto’s Daily Star and the Spanish Civil War (1937-38) a journalist for the NANA (North American News Alliance), Ernest was loath to repeat the frustrations of watching the action without being able to participate, and not since his brief experience as a reporter in Toronto (1023-24) had he written news stories. He was a feature writer whose personal perspective was always a key ingredient in the story.
Hemingway, Reynolds suggest, probably rightly,
wanted to command troops in battle, but with the freedom that independent ventures like the Pilar patrols allowed. . . He did not want an honorary commission to feed the US propaganda machine, nor did he want to become a cog in some huge operation over which he had no control. In May 1942, he explained to Max Perkins that he was willing to go to the war, send his sons to the war, and give his money to the war effort. The one thing he could not do was write propaganda.
But Hemingway’s attempts to ‘go to war and fight’ had so far never succeeded. Some accounts have him, at 18 while still working for the Kansas Star, in turn volunteering for the US army, the US navy and the US marines, but being turned down by each service because of the poor sight in his left eye.

Other accounts say he did not even bother trying to enlist because of that bad eye, but went straight to the Red Cross to get over to Europe.

According to Reynolds, in early 1944 he even applied to join the Office for Strategic Services (the OSS, which after the war evolved into the CIA). Another Reynolds, the former CIA historian Nicholas Reynolds, suggests the approach to the OSS did not come from Hemingway but was made — quite possibly at Gellhorn’s instigation — by Robert Joyce, the Havana embassy’s former second secretary and a friend of Hemingway’s and who by early 1944 had himself joined the OSS.

Writing in Studies In Intelligence in 2012, Nicholas Reynolds confirms that an approach was made and adds
Joyce cabled OSS headquarters with the suggestion that OSS Director Donovan and Whitney Shepardson, the sophisticated international businessman who was head of Secret Intelligence (SI, the espionage branch of the OSS), to consider approaching Hemingway about working for SI. This message caused some head scratching as it worked its way around the OSS. Just what could Hemingway do for the OSS? wondered Lt Cdr Turner McWine, the chief intelligence officer for the OSS in the Middle East. The author’s prominence and reputed temperament would make it hard for him to fit in.
Nicholas Reynolds records that
The SI wasn’t convinced Hemingway would be of any use to them and passed the matter on to Morale Operations (MO), the OSS’s black propaganda arm who it thought Hemingway might have more potential than for the work of SI. Hemingway’s file duly made its way over to MO, whose leaders concluded a few days later that Hemingway was too much of an individualist even for their unconventional mission.
Thus the approach came to nothing, and Michael Reynolds quotes an OSS document dated May 1, 1944, explaining that it had decided
in the negative about Hemingway. We may be wrong, but feel that, although, he undoubtedly has conspicuous abilities for this type of work, he would be too much of an individualist to work under military supervision.
Whether at any point Hemingway was aware of this — though he might well have been informed by Joyce — is simply not recorded.

. . .

When after six months away Gellhorn returned to the Finca from Europe in March 1944, Hemingway’s frustration and anger boiled over, and he took it out on her viciously. Kert, Meyers and Hemingway’s other biographers report that he subjected her to a non-stop and vicious litany of complaints and insults, accusing her of vainglory and selfishness, and madly putting herself in harm’s way simply to seek thrills.

Gellhorn later told Kert that he would sometimes even wake her at night to continue his attacks. Hemingway’s marriage was most certainly coming apart and was very soon to end.

It has long been thought that Hemingway (like his father Ed) suffered from manic depression, and Michael Reynolds believes his vicious verbal assault on Gellhorn were a symptom. He writes that never having seen her husband behave as he had
even at several years remove [Gellhorn] did not consider that Ernest might be suffering from something other than loneliness. The charges [he made against her] of being insane, of seeking out danger, or acting selfishly and irresponsibly applied as much to himself as to her. His son Gregory firmly believed that his father changed during the 1943-44 period into a different person. Hemingway’s last wife, Mary Welsh, would experience the same sort of abuse that Martha reported. It was as if some inner, furious animal was set loose, an animal over which Hemingway had some control in public, but little at home. Anyone looking backwards from 1960-61 might say that his behavior was a manifestation of the depression that eventually destroyed him.
Shorter ‘patrols’ in the Pilar had resumed in the last months of 1943, but the final patrol ended in early January. After that Hemingway spent his time brooding and drinking (and had spent Christmas 1943 without Martha).

At some point he had changed his mind about travelling to the ‘war in Europe’, but no biographer has suggested when or why. With a view to working as a correspondent, he contacted Collier’s magazine (or was contacted by the magazine — biographers vary) and by early March he had been hired.

His deal was very good indeed: $3,000 ($44,937 in 2022) for each feature of between 2,500 and 3,500 words and ‘reasonable expenses’, though once he was back in the US in 1945, part of that deal caused him grief.

He submitted a three-page long list of expenses, adding up to an extraordinary $13,436 ($201,271), but Collier’s thought the expense claims were anything but ‘reasonable’. The magazine’s managing editor described them as ‘out of all proportion to the enterprise’ — Hemingway had filed just six pieces in the ten months he was in Europe — and refused to accept them. Hemingway was furious, but eventually had to settle for $6,000 ($89,875).

The US Department of War would only allow each publication one front-line correspondent and Gellhorn was demoted. Some — not least Gellhorn — suggest that by approaching Collier’s instead of another publication — many would certainly have hired him — Hemingway was guilty of spite.

But Michael Reynolds points out that Department of War regulations at the time would not allow female correspondents any closer to the front than women serving in the US army, usually as field hospital staff. Thus Gellhorn would anyway not have been able to work on the front-line.

What was an act of spite, however, was Hemingway’s refusal to negotiate a seat for Gellhorn on the RAF plane flying him to Britain. Ironically, she herself had helped him to secure the flight after putting him in touch with the children’s author Roald Dahl. (Dahl was a British air attaché in Washington — part of Hemingway’s brief was to profile the British Royal Air Force).

But when she asked her husband to secure a seat for her, too, he claimed that no women were allowed on the flight. In fact, they were.

Instead she found herself a berth on a Norwegian ship carrying explosives to Europe and departed a day or two before he flew off, her voyage of more than two weeks made all the more uncomfortable because there was no alcohol on board; and Gellhorn, who smoked forty cigarettes a day, was also forced to abstain because of the ship’s cargo.

Arriving in London on May 17, Hemingway settled into the Dorchester Hotel in Park Lane and began a round of socialising, re-connecting with journalist friends and heavy drinking.

The photographer Robert Capa threw a welcome party for him on May 24 (and, according to his autobiography, managed to drum up ten bottles of Scotch, eight bottles of gin, a case of champagne and some brandy).

At 4am the following morning, the car in which he was returning to the Dorchester and driven by another guest as drunk as he was crashed head-on into a steel water tank in the blacked-out Lowndes Square. Hemingway was thrown head-first into the windscreen and his scalp was partly detached from his skull.

He was at first reported dead, but the following day was said to have suffered only ‘slight injuries’. In fact, he injuries were quite bad. He hurt both knees and was diagnosed with severe concussion, the first of several serious head injuries over the following months and years which are now believed to have affected his mental as well as his physical state.

Gellhorn, who had finally arrived at Liverpool on May 31 and travelled to London, immediately visited
him, only to find him and a circle of visiting cronies living it up and drinking spirits and champagne, Hemingway’s head swathed in a bandage that looked to her like a turban.

At the sight of him (left) and much to Hemingway’s irritation — he had been expecting sympathy — Gellhorn burst out laughing. She was also angry that though he was supposedly suffering from a head injury he was still boozing, and she soon left. As Reynolds puts it
Having had plenty of time at sea to review their relationship, Martha entered the room half-sure their marriage was over; when she left she had no doubt. ‘If he really had concussion, he could hardly have been drinking with his pals or even receiving them. He did not look in the least ill anyway.’ The concussion was real enough, and drinking was a sure way to make it worse. Ernest, garrulous and full of male-bonding jokes . . . was [now] with Martha in the war zone she so fervently desired, but it was a husband she hardly recognised. . . Before the ground war began on the beaches of Normandy, the private war between Martha and Ernest was finished. There was no acknowledgement of defeat by either party, but that was only a formality.
Hemingway was discharged after just three days, still in his ‘turban’ and still with his 57 stitches in place. His concussion alone would have required several weeks of recuperation, and some biographers believe he discharged himself.

He also suffered from bad headaches and continued to do so for many months, but he and the other war correspondents knew that the long-planned invasion of Europe was imminent and he did not want to miss it. The correspondents were rounded up on June 2 and driven to the south coast, and finally set out across the English Channel on the night of June 5.

In the early hours of June 6, they were transferred to the various landing craft which carried the Allied troops to the Normandy beaches. There the men stormed the beaches — many died — but the correspondents, including Hemingway, had to stay on their landing craft and were eventually taken back to the ships which had brought them over.

Once back in the Dorchester Hotel, Hemingway wrote his account of the invasion (or of what he has seen of it given his vantage point in a landing craft) in his first report for Collier’s, although it did not appear in the US until July 22.

It was a somewhat fanciful report of his day and, typically, Hemingway takes centre stage. In the piece he hints, obliquely, that he had indeed landed on Omaha Beach — he writes, ambiguously, ‘the day we took Fox Green’. Less obliquely he gives the impression that he had more or less taken over command of the landing craft from the inexperienced US army lieutenant in charge who had sought his advice.

Several conversations between them are repeated verbatim, which might have alerted sceptics, although at that point the reputation of the ‘famous writer’ as a ‘man of action’ was rarely doubted. (His new editor at Collier’s later told Hemingway he thought the work he had filed from Europe was poor, but that the readers had liked it.)

A week or two later, Hemingway’s account of the D Day invasion grew into a wholly fictional description of what he had done ‘once he was on the beach’.

This was given to a young naval lieutenant, William van Dusen, he had met in mid-May on the flight over from the US and with whom he had stayed in touch in London. 

Eighteen years later, in a piece entitled Hemingway’s Longest Day and published by True magazine in February 1962, van Dusen recounted how Hemingway had taken charge and rescued a US combat team who were pinned down on the beach by enemy fire on.

After leading the men to safety, van Dusen wrote, Hemingway had crawled all the way back across the beach to a command post to report on the situation and German positions.

In his piece van Dusen attributes the information to ‘a source’; in fact, the only ‘source’ for this piece of fiction was Hemingway himself.

Within days of arriving in London and while Martha Gellhorn was still at sea and on her way to Britain, Hemingway had met his fourth wife, Mary Welsh (right) at Soho’s White Tower restaurant.

He took her to lunch there a few days later, but that first date was apparently not memorable, and Welsh (who had many other admirers and was often squired) says she thought nothing of it.

But one night he called on her at her room in the Dorchester and when he left surprised her by telling her he intended to marry her. It would seem Hemingway, too, had decided — or realised — his marriage to Gellhorn was over.

1940-1945 — Part I: Writing gives way to the ‘war effort’, but the fame grows though another marriage begins to fail

EACH of these essays/entries is intended to stand alone, so there is a certain degree of duplication in them as it is unlikely they will be read in sequence or even that all will be read by a visitor to these pages. This is intentional: someone reading an essay/entry must not be puzzled by some allusion she or he might not understand because they have not read the other essays/entries.




Ernest may have commanded more money for his journalism, which he often viewed as a means of support while gathering experience for his fiction, but Martha was the more dedicated journalist.
Michael Reynolds, Hemingway: The Final Years.
[Martha] was smiling and cordial until Ernest asked her whether he should tell the columnist [Earl Wilson interviewing Hemingway in January 1940] how he was busted and she went to Finland to make some more money to he could go on writing his book. Her expression darkened and she said curtly not to believe him, that that was just one of his jokes. Wilson was puzzled and Martha did not elaborate. What irritated her was that Ernest interpreted everything in terms of himself. The simple fact that she supported herself, that journalism was her job, was not satisfactory to his ego. He preferred to believe that she was doing it for him.
Bernice Kert, on Martha Gellhorn
 in The Hemingway Women.


HEMINGWAY began living with Martha Gellhorn (right) in Cuba before he was divorced from Pauline Pfeiffer, and they were married on November 21, 1940, in Cheyenne, Wyoming, 17 days after his divorce came through. With that third marriage began another of what might be regarded as distinct stages in his life.

If the first stage had seen remarkable success and the second comparative failure and a slow decline in his reputation (matched, ironically, by growing fame), the third saw a spectacular revival of his standing with the publication of For Whom The Bell Tolls in 1940.

Yet he was already growing unhappy and drinking more, not least because his latest novel was such a success and he feared he could and would never repeat it. He was also plagued by guilt about ditching Pauline Pfeiffer to marry Gellhorn (as he had been plagued when he ditched Hadley Richardson for Pfeiffer).

Then there was the uncomfortable fact that within a year of marrying Gellhorn, the strains in their relationship were already beginning to show, and he could not hide from the fact. It was also apparent that both he and Gellhorn had different ideas of what their future together should look like.

Hemingway and Gellhorn had been together as a couple, illicitly and then openly, for more than three and a half years when they married; and although according to Bernice Kert in The Hemingway Women some claimed Gellhorn had done most of the running in the early days, it was Hemingway who was eventually pushing for their union to be solemnised.

Unkind friends — there are always one or two — also suggested that at heart Gellhorn was more interested in a relationship with Ernest Hemingway, the well-known writer, than Ernest Hemingway, the man. Yet given the, eventually desperate, tone of the letters she wrote to him from Britain in 1943 in which she repeatedly urged him to join her, she does seem to have loved him a great deal.

While they had been conducting an affair, their partnership worked well, especially when they were together in Spain to cover the civil war, where it is said to have thrived on the ‘excitement’ of war and the supposed secrecy of their liaison. But unlike Hadley and Pauline, Gellhorn, who was already both a published novelist and a working journalist with some experience, was ambitious. She made it plain she would not be abandoning her career, and this did not sit well with Hemingway.

After Hemingway and Gellhorn’s third trip to Spain, Collier’s asked her to report for them on the situation in Czecho-Slovakia, and Hemingway left alone for New York, Key West and then Montana alone. He returned to Paris at the end of August and Gellhorn joined him there.

Then on the last day of September 1930 the Munich Agreement — still known in the Czech Republic and Slovakia as the ‘Munich Diktat’ and the ‘Munich Betrayal’ — was signed, and ever eager to be in the fray, Gellhorn returned to Prague in November to cover the forced cession of the Sudetenland to Germany.

Just over a year later while Hemingway was immersed in writing For Whom The Bell Tolls, Collier’s asked her to cover the invasion of Finland by Soviet Russia, and she was off again for two months.

At the time Hemingway seemed to support her decision to accept the assignment, but he was not pleased (and told friends, half-seriously, ‘What old Indian likes to lose his squaw with a hard winter coming on?’). It was clear that however much she adored — her word — Hemingway, there was no way Gellhorn was going to give up her professional life to become the mothering housewife he wanted and expected.

She was adamant that her career would always come first, and that became the central fault line in their union. She also carried on working, as she confessed to her mother Edna, because she both wanted and needed her own money — she always insisted on paying her way and sharing the Hemingway household expenses.

As an independent woman of principle who had grown up the daughter of an active campaigner for women’s rights, Gellhorn resented being expected to be ‘Hemingway’s wife’ and later remarked that she had not wanted to be ‘a footnote in someone else’s life’. When The Heart Of Another, her collection of short stories, appeared in October 1941, Hemingway asked her to publish it under the name ‘Martha Hemingway’.

She refused, and in her book The Hemingway Women, Bernice Kert writes that the suggestion irritated her. Kert also reports that as marriage to Hemingway approached, Gellhorn began to feel trapped. She records that when Gellhorn wrote to her friend Clara Spiegel just before leaving for Finland to tell her she and Hemingway were soon to marry, Gellhorn had added that it
was perhaps simpler all round, but she herself thought ‘living in sin’ wonderful.
Almost 20 years later, in a letter to her friend Leonard Bernstein, she admitted
By the time I did marry [Hemingway] (driving home from Sun Valley) I did not want to, but it had gone too far in every way. I wept, secretly, silently, on the night before my wedding and my wedding night; I felt absolutely trapped.
Nor did Gellhorn keep her doubts about marriage from Hemingway, and when she voiced them, he took it badly. Michael Reynolds writes
While submerged in the final corrections [to the proofs of For Whom The Bell Tolls], Ernest’s emotional center took a heavy hit when Martha began questioning the wisdom of their marrying. At four in the morning Ernest wrote her a note, saying her news busted his heart and left him with a first-class headache. He knew that for the last eighteen months he had been ‘no gift to live with’, as she put it, but she must remember how he helped her with her book — The Heart Of Another. But if she was not going to marry him, she should tell him before he took the Pilar alone to Key West giving himself too much time to think, another veiled threat of suicide.
The problem was, Reynolds adds,
not that Martha loved him too little but he loved her too much. To Rodrigo Diaz, his pigeon-shooting companion and sometime doctor, Ernest was always at risk in his relationship with Martha. Easily hurt, he was tremendously vulnerable beneath the tough exterior with which he faced the world.
This was certainly not the first time Hemingway had used the threat of suicide as emotional blackmail. In the run-up to both his previous marriages he had also hinted darkly to his then brides-to-be that he might kill himself (and his reasoning on both occasions was less than clear).

According the Michael Reynolds, Gellhorn’s mother, Edna, was also unhappy that her daughter had agreed to marry Hemingway. Edna had first met him in August 1940 in Miami and although she liked him, she advised Gellhorn against marriage.

A few months later when Edna arrived for the wedding ceremony — biographer Kenneth S. Lynn claims ‘unexpectedly’, but it would have been natural for Martha to have been invited her mother — she again tried to persuade her daughter to call off the wedding. Many years later, Gellhorn confirmed that her mother had misgivings about the union to Valerie Danby-Smith. 

In 1959, Danby-Smith, who later married Hemingway’s third son, Gregory, had spent five months as part of Hemingway’s entourage in Spain where he was criss-crossing the country attending bullfights and in 1960 another six months with the Hemingways in Cuba. In her memoir Running With Bulls records that Martha Gellhorn told her:
I should have taken my mother’s advice and never married him. The relationship was fine as long as we were lovers Marriage was a disaster. My wise mother knew it and tried to warn me but I would not listen.
. . .

Before they married and while out West, Gellhorn suggested to Collier’s that in view of increasing Japanese aggression, she should visit China and the Far East to report on the defences in the area and the influence Japan was having in the region. Japan had first invaded China in 1931, and a second Sino-Japanese war began six years later.

Hemingway was against the trip, but he assumed that Collier’s would agree to send Gellhorn and so he intended to tag along, to protect her, he told friends, from ‘war, pestilence, carnage and adventure’.

Without telling her he arranged to supply the recently founded liberal daily PM newspaper with features on the situation in China. Privately he also agreed to report to the US government, which was supplying the Chinese nationalists with money and weapons to fight Japan.

The US, which regarded the Communists as ‘less corrupt’ than the Nationalists, suspected that the Nationalist leader Chiang Kai-shek was also using what they were supplying to wage a renewed civil war with the Communists and pocketing some of the money.

In mid-January 1941, Hemingway and Gellhorn set off on their extended tour of the Far East, which they jokingly referred to as their ‘crazy honeymoon’, beginning in New York where they first completed various errands. While they were there, Gellhorn agreed to help the newspaper columnist Earl Wilson interview Hemingway at the hotel where they were staying, and the meeting was underway when she returned from a shopping trip.

The fault line in their relationship surfaced again when Hemingway joked to Wilson that Gellhorn had agreed to report for Collier’s on the Russian invasion of Finland only to make money to allow him to go on writing his novel. This did not got down well with Gellhorn at all. Kert writes that her
expression darkened and she said curtly not to believe him, that that was just one of his jokes. Wilson was puzzled and Martha did not elaborate. What irritated her was that Ernest interpreted everything in terms of himself. The simple fact that she supported herself, that journalism was her job, was not satisfactory to his ego. He preferred to believe that she was doing it for him.
The trip to the Far East lasted for just over four months, and for Hemingway it took in four weeks in Hong Kong while Gellhorn flew off for a short tour of China and what was then Burma. She then re-joined Hemingway in Hong Kong and together they embarked on a very miserable, very cold and very rainy tour 


of southern China, which involved travelling up-river by boat and several days of riding mean Mongolian ponies along muddy mountain paths.

They met Chiang and — in a clandestine operation — the Communist leader Zhou En-lai, but neither enjoyed the tour at all. Then they parted, Hemingway slowly made his way back to the US while Gellhorn carried on to Burma, the Dutch East Indies and Singapore.

There she was astonished by the disorganised British defences, whereas the Dutch in contrast, she reported, had been a paradigm of efficiency.

Although Hemingway had not been keen on the trip from the start, he was stoical about the conditions they encountered, whereas for Gellhorn it became a never-ending agony. Hemingway was notorious for his low standards of hygiene and dishevelled appearance, but Gellhorn was fastidious over cleanliness, both her own and those of her surroundings. She hated the filth and squalor she found in China, especially the ever-present smell of ‘night soil’, the euphemism for human shit.

None of this bothered Hemingway, who enthusiastically took to Chinese cuisine and enjoyed the many boozing sessions with Chinese officials and the endless banquets held in their honour. Gellhorn did not.

Once back at the Finca Vigia in Cuba in mid-1941 life ran along the lines Hemingway envisaged but which began to challenge Gellhorn. She did not enjoy having to run his household and organise staff. She disliked that it was always open house for Hemingway’s drinking buddies from Havana who would drop in at all times.

Hemingway’s sons came to stay for the summer, and she ensured they were always amused, but that encroached on time she would rather have spent writing. His sons, Jack, Patrick and Gregory — known as Gigi — became fond of Gellhorn, although they regarded her more as a pal and an older sister than a stepmother.

At first she gamely played along with Hemingway’s ad hoc and disorganised living regime, although she did make her feelings known. (Hemingway’s sons were impressed that unlike Hadley Richardson and Pauline Pfeiffer, Gellhorn did not kowtow to their father, talked back and gave him as good as she go.)

When her mother Edna came to stay and the three of them were due to meet for lunch in Havana, Hemingway did not show up. A furious Gellhorn tracked him down to La Floridita where he was drinking with friends, bawled him out for being so rude to her mother and dragged him off. Then Japan, on December 7, 1941, attacked Pearl Harbor.

. . .

Accounts of Hemingway’s activities in Cuba over the following 27 months vary though the broad outlines are clear. From the beginning of the war in Europe, Gellhorn had been puzzled that he didn’t try to get himself hired as a war correspondent and head over there, and she persistently and increasingly nagged him to do so.

But Hemingway was content to go fishing on his boat Pilar and drink with his Cuban buddies. Nor did he attempt any new writing except to compose an introduction to Men At War, his selection of ‘war writings’ (in which he, not so modestly, included some of his own work).

Quite how Hemingway acquired a reputation for being an ‘authority on war’ is a puzzle. He certainly read very widely on the subject, but although in later life he claimed he had ‘gone to war’ in World War I and strictly he had done so, it was certainly not in the sense understood by most as ‘being under arms and fighting’.

He had arrived in Italy in 1918, but his ‘war’ lasted just a month and consisted of driving a Red Cross ambulance for two weeks, then handing out chocolate and cigarettes to Italian solders for two weeks. Hemingway later claimed that when he was in Spain during 1937 and 1938, Republican commanders had sought his advice on tactics.

Although Charles Collingwood, a fellow World War II fellow correspondent, conceded that Hemingway’s wide reading on military matters was an advantage when talking to senior army officers, that he was ever ‘consulted on tactics’ is almost certainly just another grandiose exaggeration if not an outright invention.

By May 1942, though, after a few months of inactivity, he did come up with a project which might make him useful. Hemingway believed that among the many Spanish exiles Cuba were a number of fascist sympathisers who might assist the Germans and their U-boot fleet.

He approached Spruille Braden, the newly-appointed US ambassador, to suggest that he should see up a counter-intelligence network to monitor these sympathisers.

Braden (left) was enthusiastic, although when he published his memoirs, Diplomats And Demagogues 30 years later, Braden claimed it was his idea to set up such surveillance. He wrote that he had enlisted Hemingway as a stop-gap until he could get additional FBI men to Cuba (a claim that does beg the question why he would settle on roping in Hemingway).

The network, which Hemingway eventually nicknamed ‘the Crook Factory’ and whose headquarters were the Finca guest house, was 26-strong and made up of six full-time agents and 20 part-timers.

They were all Hemingway’s Havana friends and acquaintances, high and low — drinking buddies, bartenders, fishermen, whores and even a Basque Roman Catholic priest (one of the few who had not supported the Falangists) who had fled Spain and washed up in Cuba.

They were instructed to pass on what they heard and saw, and Hemingway visited the US embassy once a week to deliver a summary of their information to the second secretary, Robert Joyce.

Very little of any use was uncovered by the network, but (writes Jeffery Meyers) Joyce, a friend of and sympathetic to Hemingway, explained why the Crook Factory’s reports were tolerated at the embassy and in Washington. If the reports, says Meyers, were
sensational [The Crook Factory was] paid more — $20 instead of $10. [But] most of these reports were contradictory — less than useful, as he caused confusion in Washington headquarters at the Pentagon — not to speak of the FBI at home and in Havana.
But, Meyers adds,
a major-general who headed G-2 in the Pentagon in 1942, said Army intelligence was interested in and welcomed reports from military attaches on all matters . . .
Whether useful and productive or not, the activities of Hemingway’s ‘spy network’ began a feud with the FBI which continued — on the Bureau’s side — until Hemingway blew his head off eighteen years later.

The FBI agents stationed at the embassy under ‘legal attache’ Raymond Leddy felt Hemingway was encroaching on their territory. (They became particularly worried when Hemingway and his network began ‘investigating’ Cuba’s head of police whom Hemingway suspected was corrupt. He most probably was, but the FBI did not want to fall out with a man on whose cooperation it relied.)

Leddy also became aggrieved after Hemingway once introduced him as a member of ‘the Gestapo’ and later described the FBI as ‘Franco’s Bastard Irish’ — Hemingway was convinced the FBI was run by Irish Roman Catholics who had instinctively supported the Fascist nationalists in Spain’s Civil War.

A file was opened on Hemingway which soon caught the attention of the FBI’s founder and boss, J. Edgar Hoover, though Hoover advised his men on the ground in Cuba to tread carefully as Hemingway seemed not only to have the ear of ambassador Braden, but, through Gellhorn who was friends with Eleanor Roosevelt, that of US president Roosevelt.

Within weeks (biographer Kenneth Lynn suggests he had already become bored with ‘counterintelligence’) Hemingway had begun another undertaking which helped him convince himself — although not Gellhorn, who also ridiculed the Crook Factory as just another excuse for Hemingway and his cronies to live it up — that he was contributing to the ‘war effort’.

After the shock of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and the devastating success German U-boats were having sinking commercial ships, Frank Knox, the US Secretary of the Navy had appealed to all US boat owners on the east and south coasts to play a useful role, and Hemingway decided to volunteer his and Pilar’s services.

The U-boats had been particularly effective in the Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico, attacking vessels carrying bauxite (needed to produce aluminium) and oil. In February 1942 the Germans had sunk nineteen ships, another nineteen in March, eleven in April, thirty-eight in May.

In the eleven months after the attack on Pearl Habor, 263 ships were sunk in the Caribbean Sea. Hemingway’s plan was to sail the Pilar in waters off Cuban coast to lure a German U-boat to the surface — there had been occasions when U-boats had stopped small private vessels to commandeer whatever fresh water, fish and vegetables might be on-board.

Then, Hemingway hoped, he and his crew could gun down any German seamen on deck, lob grenades into the U-boat’s conning tower, disable the vessel and capture it. However unlikely it seemed,


Hemingway’s proposal again found favour with ambassador Braden, and he allocated a supply of rationed gasoline, machine guns, grenades and bazookas to Hemingway and his crew.

The Pilar was even equipped with a shortwave radio and US marine radio operator to report nightly to the US navy Gulf force and even monitor possible broadcasts from U-boats. (The flaw in that proposal was that no one on the Pilar, least of all the marine radio operator, spoke or even understood German.)

At first Hemingway sailed the Pilar out of Havana and returned home to the Finca each night, but soon he decided to expand his operations to monitor the many secluded bays and inlets along Cuba’s long coastline where a German U-boat might berth unobtrusively and leave stocks of munitions and provisions. He stationed the Pilar on a small sandbank off the north-eastern coast of Cuba, and the missions began to last for several weeks at a time.

In the event no German U-boats were captured (or blown up) or any secret stocks of munitions or provisions discovered. Once when Hemingway thought the Pilar had spotted a large Spanish vessel towing why might have been a German U-boat, it was shown to be a false alarm.

Despite a conspicuous lack of success, Hemingway took his ‘war effort’ seriously, but there were sceptics: one Mario Ramírez Delgado, a captain in the Cuban Navy who did actually sink a German U-boat — the U-176 on May 15, 1943 — described Hemingway as merely
a playboy who hunted submarines off the Cuban coast as a whim.
Gellhorn was as scornful of the scheme as she was of the counterintelligence network. She believed it was nothing but a silly ruse to obtain gasoline so Hemingway could continue his marlin fishing. (None of the biographers report that Hemingway and his crew did any fishing, but they did sometimes lark about, on at least one occasion lobbing grenades at buoys off the coast).

The spying ceased at the end of April 1943, after eleven months, apparently as planned, when a number of necessary repairs kept the Pilar in dock and out of action.

Finally, in October 1943, and after waiting for the renewal of US navy authorisation for the Pilar to continue its patrols, Hemingway was informed it would not be coming through. The British had cracked the Enigma coding machine which the German admiralty used to communicate with and coordinate its U-boat fleet, and the Allies had decimated Germany’s U-boat fleet. The Germans now no longer posed a threat to Allied shipping.